The following is a letter by a member of the Stop Shepparton Super-School group in response to a refusal by the local Independent MP, Suzanna Sheed, to discuss the super-school proposal.
The Executive Committee of Save Our Schools No Transition in Shepparton has been trying for months to obtain a meeting with our local Independent MP, Suzanna Sheed, in order to present to her the reasons and concerns of members of the community that are against having one huge super school in Shepparton with no choice for schooling and poor communication about its planning.
We have been aggressively refused a meeting with Ms. Sheed. She needs to remember that she was elected to represent her constituents.
The Stop Shepparton Super-School group will hold a rally on Friday 4th October at 11.30am to protest against the merger of four secondary schools in Shepparton/Mooroopna.
The march will assemble at Suzanna Sheed’s office where we will try to present letters from the public to her again, then march down Wyndham Street to Queens Gardens and Wendy Lovell’s office where we will call on her to receive letters. There will be speakers and information for the public.
We have been fighting
hard for over six months to have our voice heard on the merger of four Greater
Shepparton secondary schools into one school of 2,700 to 3,000 students. We
have met a stony wall of silence. We have been told ‘You need to get on board
for your children’s sake, during this difficult time of transition.’ Frankly,
if one more educator, politician or mayor says that sentence again, we might
The decision to
amalgamate the four schools was made during September/October in 2017. The
so-called ‘community consultation’ involved only an online survey and two
workshops held in Mooroopna and Shepparton on the same day, that families of
secondary students could attend. The consultation was not advertised either in
time or adequately for parents to take part in.
A new study has found that recession-induced spending cuts
in school education in the United States led to declines in student achievement,
particularly in school districts serving economically disadvantaged and
minority students. It is the second study in recent years showing the effect of
spending cuts and the 27th study since 2015 showing that school
expenditure has a significant effect on student achievement.
Total government funding of Northern Territory private schools adjusted for inflation (“real funding”) increased massively between 2009 and 2017 while funding for public schools was cut. Even during the Gonski funding period of 2013-2017 the funding increases for private schools were 20-30 times that for public schools.
The NT Government took the opportunity of increased Commonwealth funding for public schools to massively cut its own real funding of public schools.
Government funding increases have been badly mis-directed in favouring private schools. About 83% of disadvantaged students in the Northern Territory are in public schools and 88% of disadvantaged schools are public schools.
Under the new Commonwealth/Northern Territory funding agreement, NT public schools will continue to be badly under-funded to 2023 and beyond while private schools will be nearly fully funded by 2023.
The following is an open letter to Victorian politicians and education department officials from a member of the Shepparton community.
I am concerned about the lack of evidence to back the Victorian Education Department’s claims that the super school is the best option for education in Shepparton. Studies have shown that large schools do not improve academic outcomes and small schools perform better in academic outcomes, discipline, mental health and safety. In the USA and UK large schools have been made into smaller ones. Studies show smaller schools graduate a larger proportion of their students than do large schools. Schools with populations of diverse or disadvantaged backgrounds should be limited to 600 or fewer students. Schools with advantaged students should be capped at about 1000 students.
The evidence that increased expenditure on schools improves
student outcomes continues to accumulate. Yet another
study has found that it increases test scores, reduces drop-out rates and
increases tertiary education enrolments.
The Minister for Education, James Merlino, is treating the
Shepparton/Mooroopna community with breathtaking arrogance and contempt in
refusing to provide any evidence that the new super-school will improve school
outcomes. He has repeatedly avoided fronting the community to justify the
The Minister claims that the merger will boost student
results. Yet, two years after the plan was first mooted, he hasn’t provided any
evidence for his claim. When faced with a direct request for this evidence at a
community meeting in Shepparton, government representatives couldn’t provide
There is good reason for this failure and the Minister’s
attempt to bluff it out – there is little evidence to support his claim!
Finland has been in the spotlight of the education
world since it appeared, against all odds, on the top of the rankings of an
international test known as PISA, the Program for
International Student Assessment, in the early 2000s. Tens of thousands
visitors have traveled to the country to see how to improve their own schools.
Hundreds of articles have been written to explain why Finnish education is so
marvelous — or sometimes that it isn’t. Millions of tweets have been shared and
read, often leading to debates about the real nature of Finland’s schools and
about teaching and learning there.
We have learned a lot about why some education
systems — such as Alberta, Ontario, Japan and Finland — perform better year
after year than others in terms of quality and equity of student outcomes. We
also understand now better why some other education systems — for example,
England, Australia, the United States and Sweden — have not been able to
improve their school systems regardless of politicians’ promises, large-scale
reforms and truckloads of money spent on haphazard efforts to change schools
during the past two decades.
Total government funding per student in ACT public schools adjusted for inflation (“real funding”) was cut between 2009 and 2017. In contrast, per student funding for Catholic schools was massively boosted and Independent schools received a lesser but significant increase. Public schools endured a massive cut in funding during the Gonski funding period of 2013-2017 while Catholic schools received a huge boost in funding and Independent schools a small increase.